The preprints here are available to download to encourage
discussion at Ordinary Meetings of the Society before
publication in the Journal of the Royal Statistical
Society. Certain other papers which will appear in the
journal, such as Presidential addresses, are provided for early
dissemination of material that may be of wide interest. However,
these preprints will typically be removed from this site as soon as
they have appeared in print. All preprints available here are
provisional and therefore subject to later amendment by the
authors. If you would like to receive a preprint for each meeting automatically by
e-mail, please contact Charlotte Stovell at journal@rss.org.uk.
The meetings are usually held at the Society's premises in
London and normally begin at 5.00 p.m., with tea available from
4.30 p.m. Fellows and guests are welcome to attend the
free informal drinks reception which follows the Ordinary
Meeting at about 7 p.m. The meetings may be preceded by an informal
session at 3.00 p.m. on the issues raised by the papers.
2009
- Ordinary Meeting, Wednesday,
September 23rd, 2009
P. J. Diggle, R. Menezes and T. Su - Research Section Ordinary
Meeting, Wednesday, October 14th, 2009
C. Andrieu, A. Doucet and R. Holenstein
Presidential addresses
- The Address of the President, Wednesday, December
10th, 2008
D. J. Hand (Modern statistics: the myth and the magic) (PDF 1.7 MB) - The Address of the
President, Wednesday, December 12th, 2007
D. Tim Holt (Official statistics, public policy and public trust) (PDF 580 KB) - The Address of the
President, Wednesday, June 15th, 2005
A. P. Grieve (The professionalization of the 'shoe clerk')
Discussion at Ordinary Meetings
Contributions to the discussion at Ordinary Meetings are
welcome, whether in person at the meeting or subsequently in
writing. If you would like to speak at a meeting, please contact
Charlotte Stovell at journal@rss.org.uk, preferably
at least a week before the date of the meeting. Contributions must
not exceed 5 minutes' speaking time and 400 words for publication
in the journal (excluding details of any references quoted). In
either case, written versions should be sent to the Executive
Editor at the Royal Statistical Society, 12 Errol Street, London,
EC1Y 8LX, UK, or by e-mail as PostScript or PDF file attachments to
journal@rss.org.uk to arrive
no later than 2 weeks after the meeting. If time allows,
contributions that are received before the day of the meeting
may be read out by the Secretary for the meeting on behalf of
anyone who cannot attend.
Preprints
P. J.
Diggle (Lancaster University and Johns Hopkins University
School of Medicine, Baltimore), R. Menezes (University of
Minho) and T. Su (Lancaster
University)
Geostatistical inference under preferential
sampling
Geostatistics involves the fitting of
spatially continuous models to spatially discrete data.
Preferential sampling arises when the process that determines the
data locations and the process being modelled are stochastically
dependent. Conventional geostatistical methods assume, if only
implicitly, that sampling is non-preferential. However, these
methods are often used in situations where sampling is likely to be
preferential. For example, in mineral exploration, samples may be
concentrated in areas that are thought likely to yield high
grade ore. We give a general expression for the likelihood function
of preferentially sampled geostatistical data and describe how this
can be evaluated approximately by using Monte Carlo methods.
We present a model for preferential sampling and demonstrate
through simulated examples that ignoring preferential sampling can
lead to misleading inferences. We describe an application of
the model to a set of biomonitoring data from Galicia, northern
Spain, in which making allowance for preferential sampling
materially changes the results of the analysis.
To be
published in
Series C.
Download:
- Geostatistical inference under preferential sampling (PDF 1.8 MB)
- Data (.doc file, 7 KB) and 'Readme' file (.doc file, 1 KB)
C. Andrieu
(University of Bristol), A. Doucet and R. Holenstein (University of
British Columbia)
Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo
methods
Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and
sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) methods have emerged as the two main
tools to sample from high dimensional probability distributions.
Although asymptotic convergence of MCMC algorithms is ensured under
weak assumptions, the performance of these algorithms is unreliable
when the proposal distributions that are used to explore the
space are poorly chosen and/or if highly correlated variables are
updated independently. We show how it is possible to build
efficient high dimensional proposal distributions by using SMC
methods. This allows us not only to improve over standard MCMC
schemes but also to make Bayesian inference feasible for a large
class of statistical models where this was not previously so. We
demonstrate these algorithms on a non-linear state space model and
a Lévy-driven stochastic volatility model.
N. Meinshausen (University of Oxford) and P.
Bühlmann (Eidgenössiche Technische Hochschule
Zürich)
Stability selection
Estimation of structure, such as in
variable selection, graphical modelling or cluster analysis, is
notoriously difficult, especially for high dimensional data. We introduce stability selection. It is based
on subsampling in combination with
(high dimensional) selection algorithms. As such, the method is extremely general and has a
very wide range of applicability. Stability selection provides finite sample control
for some error rates of false
discoveries and hence a transparent
principle to choose a proper amount of
regularisation for structure estimation. Variable selection and
structure estimation improve markedly for a range of selection
methods if stability selection is applied. We prove for the
randomized lasso that stability
selection will be variable selection consistent even if the necessary conditions needed
for consistency of the original lasso
method are violated. We demonstrate
stability selection for variable selection and Gaussian
graphical modelling, using real and simulated
data.
